View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:01 pm Post subject: JR-149 |
|
|
Anybody have the JRs? I have had a set for a couple of years now and just picked up the LPA sub, that is one of the active sub units, Rogers produced. Any suggestions for set up? I am using a Dyna ST70 amp with a Audible Illusions Mod. 3 pre and Lp12/sumiko mmt/ denon dl103 front end.
Thx
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Anybody have the JRs |
Yes two pairs .
Quote: | Any suggestions for set up |
A simple cheap Y-splitter betwen your pre and power, as the subs response was talored to the natural roll off of the JR149 so no messing around was needed.
If you have serious problems I suggest you contact "da man" Graham Hartle directly, jr149@blueyonder.co.uk . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Colin right now the sub is run from the LPA unit which has a crossover in it as well as an amp to run the sub as a mono unit. The speaker connections go directly to the LPA and are split off to the monitors w/o alteration and then to the LPA to convert to mono and amplified.
Were you suggesting to run the LPA from the pre as opposed to the speaker outs? Would it be enough signal?
Thx
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Were you suggesting to run the LPA from the pre as opposed to the speaker outs? Would it be enough signal |
Yup as the subs input sensitivity is up to 3V you should be able to split things and get an acoustic balance to taste. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thx Colin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Colin, it didn't work running from the pre outs. The gain was too small. Would have to mods to the LPA to operate like you suggest.
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Micromegas73 Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 14 Location: FRANCE
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello David,
I'm a David myself
I have a pair of JR149 too. Great little speakers ! I don't know the LPA sub, maybe a picture could help...
And the ColinR's suggestion should be a good one too: my pair of JR149 had a "tired" crossover, Graham Hartle made me a new one. The man apparently knows very well the work of Jim Rogers.
see you,
David. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David, I made the Type 24 crossover myself, using the plans on Graham's site. Cost me nearly the same as Graham's but at least I avoided duties. I made them outboard and also kept the old crossovers and made them outboard as well. The sub makes a big difference in bass reproduction, duuh. Just have to be careful not to crank it up too much.
Here is a link to the LPA system. There was also a passive sub and another active system the EX that could be connected to a pre out, and had a separate 60 watt amp.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Superb-JR-149-JR149-subwoofer-with-LPA-amplifier_W0QQitemZ180130515149QQihZ008QQcategoryZ14991QQcmdZViewItem
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | it didn't work running from the pre outs. The gain was too small. Would have to mods to the LPA to operate like you sugges |
Sorry about that, but with the three outputs on my my Quad 44s I generally just have to attenuate to fiddle such arrangements.
Now an alternative would be to run a your tape output into the line input of a small mixer, output to sub.
The alternative alternative is find a cheap working amplifier or receiver in a charity/thrift shop to insert into your tape loop. Fiddle to taste.
The final alternative alternative alternative is to find and ADC Soundshaper equalizer or similar that offers unity gain on it's ins and outs. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like.
Last edited by ColinR on Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thx Colin.
The JR literature indicates that the LPA runs the JR149s throughout their range, that is w/o any frequency shaping. the LF signal is supposedly taken from the speakers from the amp, and extracted for the sub, which is driven by the LPA amp.
Yes I could run another amp into the LPA from my Pre and run my ST70 directly from the pre as well, or
Just look for a sub amp with a line in feature. I have some spare integrateds around that I can play with to see if there is any difference.
I take it you are suggesting the signal would be cleaner for both sub and satellites w/o having to pass both through the LPA.
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | take it you are suggesting the signal would be cleaner for both sub and satellites w/o having to pass both through the LPA |
Yup.
I've never been enamoured of the LPA / JR149 combination, it imho always sounds much better if you keep things apart and fiddle about just a little. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thx Colin,
Will be easy to give it a go. The theory that the original signal can go to the satellites w/o any changes, but that the LF can be channelled off sounds too good to be true.
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | theory that the original signal can go to the satellites w/o any changes, but that the LF can be channelled off sounds too good to be true |
Agreed and knowing something of Jim Rogers character especially his aversion to spending money and always trying to do things on the cheap.
The LPA amplifier is workmanlike (apparently it's not a stripped down Cadet or Panthera in production versions), but not refined and the JR149s can do refined really well when given the chance, so why not give them that chance?
Have fun . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like.
Last edited by ColinR on Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Micromegas73 Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 14 Location: FRANCE
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote: | David, I made the Type 24 crossover myself, using the plans on Graham's site. Cost me nearly the same as Graham's but at least I avoided duties. I made them outboard and also kept the old crossovers and made them outboard as well. The sub makes a big difference in bass reproduction, duuh. Just have to be careful not to crank it up too much.
Here is a link to the LPA system. There was also a passive sub and another active system the EX that could be connected to a pre out, and had a separate 60 watt amp.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Superb-JR-149-JR149-subwoofer-with-LPA-amplifier_W0QQitemZ180130515149QQihZ008QQcategoryZ14991QQcmdZViewItem
David |
Congratulations ! My type 24 crossovers were made by Graham Hartle, i'm unfortunately unable to make them by myself. I also kept the old crossover, but what do you call "outboard" ? i'm not sure to understand.
Concerning the sub, i don't know it, but i believe those loudspeakers are very musical and works quite well without any subwoofer. In my (little) experience, a subwoofer is always a difficult thing to settle properly in order to make a system sing. Tell us how the whole thing sounds if you solve your connections issues (if i understood correctly what you were talking about with ColinR).
Anyway, this sub has a decorative value in my opinion and can easily be recycled |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Intermediate Contributor 75+
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Posts: 90 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Outboard means that they are in a separate box, outside the enclosure.
I separated the satellites and sub last night as per Colin's suggestion and the change was remarkable. A lot more detail from the satellites.
Thank you Colin.
David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|