View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lurer Introductory Contributor
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:44 am Post subject: KEF Calinda Type SP1053 crossovers? |
|
|
Hi!
I am the happy owner of a pair of Calindas i found on a fleemarket last weekend
Im very happy with them, but i know there is some things i would like to do; Change terminals, internal wiring and look over the crossovers.
My problem is that i can't find a crossover schema for SP1053. Is it the same as for SP1054?
Do you have any examples of things i should check on them? Things that is known to be of not so good standard as it could be, or to improve the original configuration.
Also the dome of the tweeter on one speaker is pressed in a little bit. Is there a safe way to get it out and will it affect the sound in any way?
Espen,
Norway |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Waste of money.
Waste of money.
Quote: | and look over the crossovers | Good idea but don't spend loads of money on "fancy" capacitors, the inductors and fluffy looking metal oxide resistors don't need replacing. 6.8uF is near enough to 7uF btw.
Quote: | My problem is that i can't find a crossover schema for SP1053 |
It hasn't moved.
http://www.hifiloudspeakers.info/Anatomy/Crossovers/Calinda/CalindaCrossoverIndex.html
Quote: | dome of the tweeter on one speaker is pressed |
Suck it out with the aid of a toilet roll inner or wrap adhesive tape around the back of your hand (sticky side outside) and roll it accross the dome to tease out the dimple.
Quote: | will it affect the sound | Small 2-3mm dimples will not. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lurer Introductory Contributor
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply Colin.
Well, one terminal is already replaced by a previous owner, so ill get two alike anyway..
Maybe internal rewiring is a waste. I'll leave it for now. I never got caught in the "lets buy expensive loudpseaker cables and get good sound"-crazyness, but i do have some good speakercables (2,5 or 4 mm2 solid core installation cable. Like you got in your house probably), and they beat the cables i have tested. Like my pair of Kimber 8PR. Beat them by a big margin even.
For crossovers.. Im no expert, so i will listen ot good advice. Everything is working right now, but i would think someone did have some experience in upgrading or replacing some components looking for better sound?
Thanks for the link for the crossover. I have seen it, but i thought thought it was for Type1054. These model and type names are still very new, and i must have miss understood
Espen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lurer Introductory Contributor
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have read that the speakers were designed to give a good listening experience for as many listening positions as possible, and that the placement of elements in the cab is very important.
It was also said that even though the speakers are small, they were meant to give correct vertical dispersion at 3 meters.
I dont have more than 2,5 meters, and also think the speakers look very small compared to what im used too. Will it affect the sound in a negative way to put them on a thick slab of stone, or rising them even higher, lets say 10 inches of the floor, on a custom made foot or stand?
And if its no negative effects, can i expect any positive effects?
The plastic knobs on them now are not doing a good job with my floor. I need something new under there in any case. _________________ So, this is how Vintage KEF sounds like |
|
Back to top |
|
|
audiolabtower VIP Contributor 500+
Joined: 06 Jan 2009 Posts: 686
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they were designed as floor standers so I would not raise them too far, particularly since the vertical "lobe" of flat response through the crossover points upwards so listening at tweeter level might be somewhat dull compared to B200 or top of cabinet level and too far off the floor maybe a little bass light though you may prefer a "faster/lighter " bass?
Now some spikes and a couple of concrete slabs could well be a very good idea worthy of experimenting... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SaSi Senior Contributor 200+
Joined: 24 Aug 2008 Posts: 256
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is only one thing I would consider for a pair of Calindas (or any other KEF speaker from that era).
They utilize bitumen pads attached to the inside of the enclosure for dampening vibration. After 30+ years these pads have lost their flex and became unflexible and brittle.
Its likely they have lost the effect they were designed to provide and perhaps replacing them with new pads would deliver an improvement, back to original specs.
OTOH, since the pads are now so stiff and also very well attached to the panels, it is also likely they perform differently offering not dampening but increasing the stiffness of the panels, to a similar effect of reducing coloration.
Anyway, removing these is a messy job and I decided it's not worth doing and risking damage to the enclosures.
Regarding connectors and cables, I found the wires connecting the binding posts to the crossover to have corroded and accumulate lots of dirt. I'm not sure if that is detrimental to the signal but nonetheless it's easy to just cut the ends of the wires and re-solder new wire with new solder to the binding posts after a good cleaning.
Out of curiosity, what is the internal filling of your Calindas? Is there thick foam attached to the panels? Is there loose fibre stuffed inside? Or is there a thin layer of white fibrus material stapled to the panels?
I'm asking as I suspect that someone fiddled with the stuffing of a pair of Calindas I obtained and am restoring. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Out of curiosity, what is the internal filling of your Calindas? Is there thick foam attached to the panels? Is there loose fibre stuffed inside? Or is there a thin layer of white fibrus material stapled to the panels?
I'm asking as I suspect that someone fiddled with the stuffing of a pair of Calindas I obtained and am restoring. |
There should be a 2.75" thick slab of foam on the back of the cabinet and a single piece of 1.25" foam which wraps around the top and sides (with cutouts for the bracing) crossing over by a few inches on the bottom panel. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SaSi wrote: | ... After 30+ years these pads have lost their flex and became unflexible and brittle. Its likely they have lost the effect they were designed to provide and perhaps replacing them with new pads would deliver an mprovement... Anyway, removing these is a messy job and I decided it's not worth doing and risking damage to the enclosures. |
A hairdryer and some patience soon makes the panels compliant enough to remove without damaging the cabinet. _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lurer Introductory Contributor
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the tips guys.
Right now im in the middle of another project, so restoring the Calindas will have to wait a while.
Im very impressed by the sound of them (compared to my current speakers at least), so they'll get a good long life in this house. _________________ So, this is how Vintage KEF sounds like |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SaSi Senior Contributor 200+
Joined: 24 Aug 2008 Posts: 256
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | Quote: | Out of curiosity, what is the internal filling of your Calindas? Is there thick foam attached to the panels? Is there loose fibre stuffed inside? Or is there a thin layer of white fibrus material stapled to the panels?
I'm asking as I suspect that someone fiddled with the stuffing of a pair of Calindas I obtained and am restoring. |
There should be a 2.75" thick slab of foam on the back of the cabinet and a single piece of 1.25" foam which wraps around the top and sides (with cutouts for the bracing) crossing over by a few inches on the bottom panel. |
That confirms my suspicion that my pair of Calindas had been messed with (apart from that yellow paintjob). What I found inside was a thin layer (1/4" thick) of synthetic wool plus some very loose fluffy synthetic wool throughout the volume of the enclosure.
So, you say the panels around the PR in the bottom of the cabinet have no foam lining? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | So, you say the panels around the PR in the bottom of the cabinet have no foam lining |
No, you have a single thick slab that covers the back and a bit of the top and bottom, with a single thinner piece covering the sides, top and overlapping on the bottom panel. i.e. a truncated N + a "square" O . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SaSi Senior Contributor 200+
Joined: 24 Aug 2008 Posts: 256
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | Quote: | So, you say the panels around the PR in the bottom of the cabinet have no foam lining |
No, you have a single thick slab that covers the back and a bit of the top and bottom, with a single thinner piece covering the sides, top and overlapping on the bottom panel. i.e. a truncated N + a "square" O . |
I will have some interesting cutting to do... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|