View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Motorcycle Boy Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:57 am Post subject: Ideal box for B139 ? |
|
|
Hi
reading and surfing about the B139 I learned that the Concerto's box seems to be "too small" for it to deliver the best it can. In stead of 62 L it should have something around 150 L
Did anybody ever try to develop the ideally constructed and sized loudspeakerbox around this B139 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Around 100 litres, peoples' minds tend to gravitate towards transmission lines like Bailey, Webb, Atkinson, etc, where you get more bang (fast bass) for a smilarly sixed box.
The infinite baffle/reflex designs I know about that are in the ~100 litre class include.
A Heathkit design from the early 70's, which had a 2'*4" port at it's base filled with a foam wedge.
A Dutch pentagonal (with two short sides) CS7, the kits were made in Friesland. Occasionally seen on German ePay.
The Schlank und rank isn't a pigmy either.
http://www.hifiloudspeakers.info/Anatomy/KEFDocuments/KEFGermanGallery/pages/p24.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
boyzo Intermediate Contributor 25+
Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:20 pm Post subject: Re: Ideal box for B139 ? |
|
|
160 liters vent tuned to 23Hz = room shaking bass
Motorcycle Boy wrote: | Hi
reading and surfing about the B139 I learned that the Concerto's box seems to be "too small" for it to deliver the best it can. In stead of 62 L it should have something around 150 L
Did anybody ever try to develop the ideally constructed and sized loudspeakerbox around this B139 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
adam2a3 Introductory Contributor
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:44 am Post subject: Re: Ideal box for B139 ? |
|
|
Hi boyzo, any dimensions for the 160 lt boxe's port available? I am currently using the CS7 box as a sub cabinet. Regards,adam2a3
boyzo wrote: | 160 liters vent tuned to 23Hz = room shaking bass
Motorcycle Boy wrote: | Hi
reading and surfing about the B139 I learned that the Concerto's box seems to be "too small" for it to deliver the best it can. In stead of 62 L it should have something around 150 L :shock:
Did anybody ever try to develop the ideally constructed and sized loudspeakerbox around this B139 :?: |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
160l box ~100cm*34cm*47cm, port 10cm dia * 8cm long. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
adam2a3 Introductory Contributor
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | 160l box ~100cm*34cm*47cm, port 10cm dia * 8cm long. |
Thanks CollinR, I will give it a try keeping the CS7 crossover (low pass section). Regards, adam2a3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
speakerguru Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 1192 Location: Green Hut, Tovil
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:21 am Post subject: Re: Ideal box for B139 ? |
|
|
Motorcycle Boy wrote: | ..... I learned that the Concerto's box seems to be "too small" for it to deliver the best it can. In stead of 62 L it should have something around 150 L |
That is just the small signal frequency response. Don't forget to consider the large signal requirements. If you want X dB spl at 20Hz then you have to be able to shift Y cc of air, otherwise the B139 will just be hitting the end stops when you drive it with a big amplifier in a big box. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|