View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
meeuwnie Introductory Contributor
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:26 am Post subject: KEF RR 101 early vs. later versions |
|
|
Hi, I own two pairs of KEF reference 101's. They're both later editions in black. I had to open one up recently after some tweeter problems and noticed that the loudspeaker-cabinet had no dampening-material on the inside (only the usual white fluffy foam) and also the crossover-unit was no longer placed in a concealed box as with earlier models.
I assume that KEF altered the inner-design out of economic reasons but did it actually influence the sound quality? Did anyone on this forum have a chance to compare earlier models with the later ones?
Greetings from the Netherlands
and a happy New Year! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny my late walnut veneered pair has panel damping, perhaps it's down to the colour.
There is no difference in sound quality or quantity i.m.h.o. between early crocodile clip and later binding post versions. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | Funny my late walnut veneered pair has panel damping, perhaps it's down to the colour. There is no difference in sound quality or quantity i.m.h.o. between early crocodile clip and later binding post versions. |
Colin, can you tell me as to what kind of damping material has been used please? Same pads as in 104aB? _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | what kind of damping material has been used please? Same pads as in 104aB? |
Yup, usual single sheets of ~4mm Dedsheet stapled to the carcass sides and backs with ~6mm gaps around the edges.
I wonder if you can improve the "musicality" with staples made from different materials? _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | Quote: | what kind of damping material has been used please? Same pads as in 104aB? |
Yup, usual single sheets of ~4mm Dedsheet stapled to the carcass sides and backs with ~6mm gaps around the edges.
I wonder if you can improve the "musicality" with staples made from different materials? |
Hmm, tricky one this Colin, would that be cryogenically treated ones? _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meeuwnie Introductory Contributor
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:08 pm Post subject: photos |
|
|
Hereby, some photos of the inner cabinet, foam and filter.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: photos |
|
|
Interesting, thank you for sharing. Who forgot the panel damping in the factory and where were QC? _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meeuwnie Introductory Contributor
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got curious and opened up another cabinet from the other pair that i have and this one doesn't have any ded-sheet either.
So it looks like KEF did't accidentally forgot to apply the ded-sheets.
Funny, i bought both sets on the internet separately. I got one pair from Ebay-Germany and one year later a second pair in the Netherlands and now noticed that the serial-numbers are quite close 11835AB and 11881AB.
They're very close relatives.
...so there still might be a slight chance that the same quality-controller had a day off when these four were manufactured. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I saw for the first time the inside of 104 it had by the look of it original damping panels about twice as thick as in the ones I bought for myself later (104aB) and the seen in subsequent KEF loudspeakers.
I was so disapponted! Was the 1st one I saw a one off? Also if I remember correctly they were not so hard as the Ded-sheet.
Perhaps some of the KEF Old Timers may be able to throw some light on this?
I have never ventured inside a 101 yet... _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdwhelan Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 28 Oct 2008 Posts: 12 Location: Wigan
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
proffski wrote: | When I saw for the first time the inside of 104 it had by the look of it original damping panels about twice as thick as in the ones I bought for myself later (104aB) and the seen in subsequent KEF loudspeakers.
I was so disapponted! Was the 1st one I saw a one off? |
My old 104's had thicker damping panels compared to my cousins 104aB's. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdwhelan wrote: | proffski wrote: | When I saw for the first time the inside of 104 it had by the look of it original damping panels about twice as thick as in the ones I bought for myself later (104aB) and the seen in subsequent KEF loudspeakers.
I was so disapponted! Was the 1st one I saw a one off? |
My old 104's had thicker damping panels compared to my cousins 104aB's. |
The mystery deepens... _________________ I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a
man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
-Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|