View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject: new member - recent ebay purchase - any info appreciated |
|
|
hi
i'm rob campbell and have recently joined the forum. i've owned a pair of nightingale nm1 speakers for some years and have just bought some whopping speakers from ebay -
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280432037902&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT
i'd really appreciate it if anyone knows any info about the above 0 i've not even tried them yet as i am not able to lift them at present!
just for info i mostly listen to bbc radio 2,3,4 these days ; i;ve a tandberg 70s receiver , also a quad 22/II setup and a 300b valve amp.
regards
rob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ePrey pimp speak "of £1780 each" NO ~£178 from Nippro?
A "real" homebrew design!
i.e. a pair of Chris Rogers Pro9TL cabinets fitted with KEF B139B, B110A, T27, Coles 4001, which would normally be found in his "rip-off" of Bert Webb's Cambridge Audio R50.
The fun thing is with the drive units at the top, you'll get the presentation offered by Lentek Monitors or IMF TLS80/RSPMs, although the T27 and B110 should have had their relative positions transposed!
Pro9TLS http://www.tech-diy.com/LS_Articles.htm have the bass unit at the bottom and should have a Peerless KO40MRF midrange and an Isophon, Peerless or Audax tweeter.
_________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks colin - i'll have a look at the ref - what's nippro??
i think the seller was a really genuine bloke who was passing on the description he was given - cheers rob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | what's nippro??
i think the seller was a really genuine bloke who was passing on the description he was given |
If it's not the usual sleazeBay chain pulling, I'm afraid someone has been telling "porkies" for you'd get a pretty good custom sound reinforcement system for ~£3500 in 1978 using Altec, Volt, Electro Voice, Eminence, Celestion Pro or JBL units and at least couple of Crown DC-300As to drive them.
It wouldn't be a pair of domestic transmission line loudspeakers no matter how well they were built.
Nippro made Pro9TLs on a commercial basis. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rait Introductory Contributor
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 8 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rather than the Pro 9, i think you'll find they are based on Chris Rogers' earlier design which was published in HI-FI ANSWERS. That version used the Kef drivers & Coles supertweeter as well as the mid positioned T/line vent as per the Ebay units, though they have repositioned the drivers grouping them all in the upper area of the baffle.
Where were the Nippro versions made?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Rather than the Pro 9, i think you'll find they are based on Chris Rogers' earlier design which was published in HI-FI ANSWERS |
No, they're wider, so
Quote: | Chris Rogers Pro9TL cabinets fitted with KEF B139B, B110A, T27, Coles 4001, which would normally be found in his "rip-off" of Bert Webb's Cambridge Audio R50 |
and Nippro made their version in Southampton . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rait Introductory Contributor
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 8 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both the HiFi Answers version & the Pro9-TL are 13.5" wide!!
I have both sets of plans in front of me as i type having built the HiFi Answers TSL, in the 70's & contemplated building the PRO9s, but instead moved on to other things.
The HiFi Answers TLS, is 1" taller than the PRO9 at 39" & 1/2" deeper at 18", so dimensions are pretty much identical for both of the Chris Rogers designs.
I'm not familiar with the Cambridge Audio R50, i don't think it sold in Aust, but we did have their TL100 & 200 transmission lines. The bigger TL200 was 13"W X 17.5"D X 42.5"H. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
14.25"
They're also shorter, 36.75" (using the B139B chassis dimensions as reference) than the 39" high 1974 Burt Webb design, subsequently "knocked off" by Chris Rogers for Hi-fi Answers or the 38" Pro 9TL.
The full width port (27" from the top) and resizing suggest an "adaptable design" not the more complex Webb plan. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: now up and running |
|
|
hi chaps
thanks for the replies , they are 40.5" high (with some small feet to allow the cables in) , 19.5" deep and 13.5" wide.
i now have them running with quad fm4 , 22 and 2 IIs and they sound very nice ; connecting the speaker cable was a bit of a fiddle - just 2 small screws on each base - seemed much lower quality than the rest of the speakers.
any advice on power handling please? are they designed for a particular max wattage for example? or more relevantly perhaps , is there a particular type of amp that would suit them best?
regards
rob c |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. Spend a few quid on replacing the old Alcap electrolytic capacitors, they're probably acting as small resistors after 20-30 years.
2. The crossover is probably a "stock" or higher powered version of the Cambridge R50 unit, so 15W light bulbs, 25-100W solid state.
3. Get a pair of round plate 5-way binding posts and practice with a tank cutter on a piece of scrap wood first.
4. As the single largest user of Quad equipment (according to Quad Service) I'm not allowed to be biased , so stick a Sugden or Croft up their backsides, although they'll be quite happy with most European amplificaion and American muscle amplifiers with care.
They will be "picky" with Japanese amplifiers and tuner-amps, so Pioneer Reference, Yamaha, Sansui and odd sods like the transformer outputted 100W JVC power amplifer, which was the oriental take on the Quad 303/50E without the hassle . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like.
Last edited by ColinR on Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: thank you |
|
|
wow , thanks for the comprehensive reply colin. nice to know my old 15watters are in the right ballpark ; they suit my ears for a large part of my listening.
i will look up '5 way binding post' but think its unlikely i will unleash my crude manual skills upon them ; i may be able to persuade others.
may i ask a further question? -
does it matter which brand of capacitor one buys? i am not technically competent either but have read about the deterioration you mention.
many thanks
rob campbell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | does it matter which brand of capacitor one buys? |
This all depends upon how deep your pockets are and how "golden" your hearing.
So in increasing sound quality and cost you have reversible electrolytic, polyester, film and possibly poncy caps, where you may or may not hear the angels .
I'd wait unitl next month and see what Jerry Bloomfield under Malcolm Jones' guidance has to offer at www.falcon-acoustics.co.uk until then just prowl around the "old" website's hints and tips section, A-level Physics ac theory and read up about esr.
When buying start off cheap and after a long good listen you'll soon get a feel for which octave needs a brighter/more expensive/lower esr crossover component. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hearing varies from cloth through brass to silver i would imagine ; i am in possession of an old school a level physics although it has not served me well in the real world.
i recall that falcon had something to do with the nm1 speakers i have. i'm still looking for a picture of them with the foam intact or a drawing as i quite fancy restoring the cosmetics to their original glory.
cheers for the amusing and highly informative reply , its most appreciated.
regards
rob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Finally dump the Quad pre, some of the Croft 3 and 5 series sound much, much better with Quad IIs . _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robc Introductory Contributor
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: sadly these now have to go to a new home |
|
|
please see the post in the classifieds |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|