View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
krimney Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 25 Apr 2003 Posts: 13 Location: Alberta
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: cabinet volume |
|
|
I am toying with the idea of building a speaker cabinet and using kef bass drivers in it. Aesthetics will be as important as the sound but I'd still like it to sound good.
I was thinking of either a B139 or a B300 as the bass driver, likely with a Kef 105 II crossover (less the s-stop circuit).
I may try using all the components of a pair of concertos in the new cab as well.
My bass enclosure would be triangular in shape, and I am thinking sealed with a voulme of approx 6 cubic feet.
Reaching the low frequencies will be more important than high volume...I'll be in an apartment.
Any suggestions?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | approx 6 cubic feet |
Presuming you have the Ref 105-2 "heads" to use the time aligned crossover (the standard CS9 box and frequency domain PL301 crossovers using the same drivers are different) for the B300Bs, you nead a sealed box of 65 to 75 litres NOT 179!
You might consider this
http://www.hifiloudspeakers.info/Anatomy/KEFDocuments/KEFGermanGallery/pages/p18.htm
. _________________ This post or any other information supplied to this website or any other by myself is not available for any form of commercial purpose i.e. to hi-fi magazines or as sales and marketing material for sleezeBay or Audiodogging pimps and the like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
krimney Junior Contributor 10+
Joined: 25 Apr 2003 Posts: 13 Location: Alberta
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: No 105 heads |
|
|
I do not have the 105 heads. I thought that all the crossover components for the 105 were in the lower unit. i thought it was just the s-stop circuit was in hte head and that this had no effect on sound....that it was only a protection circuit.
Looking at my original idea, my dimension might have been too big, a 2 foot wide speaker may be too much, could make the base 1.5x1.5 which would bring the volume down to around 80 or so depending on internal bracing ...
I was thinking about a triangle for the base(about 3' high) with an inverted triangle(about 1' high) above it housing the mid tweet |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SaSi Senior Contributor 200+
Joined: 24 Aug 2008 Posts: 256
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you are considering an inverted pyramid for the tweeter, then think twice. The pointy edges and corners are not a good idea as they will be emitting diffractve waves.
Also, if you are going to use a B139 or a B300 as a bass driver, then you most likely need a midrange of sorts. An 8~5" driver (B200 or B110 in KEF terms).
The original 105 with the B300 was combined with a B110 and many B139 based designs use either the B110 or the B200. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|